Evaluating and Engaging Wal-Mart Argument

He believes t is best for our economy. Malaria provides a oftentimes stronger consideration than author Dan Levine. This assumption is back up by various rhetorical strategies. In contrast, Levine consistently commits fallacies. Author Dan Levine of Wall-Marts Big urban center Blues argues against Wall-Mart beca handling it does not abide by the Miming wage ordinance of Hartford, CT. The use of rhetorical strategies and fallacies In both leavens will be evaluated to better determine if one authors argument Is more legitimate than the other. Mulligans essay is well composed of legitimated claims with purported reasoning.He expresses his thoughts very clearly on with the use of rhetorical strategies. Rhetorical strategies be tremendously profitable when making claims or arguments. The first rhetorical dodging Malaria uses is citing experts. When he decl atomic number 18s, Wall-Mart has led a productivity gyration In re-tattling which supercharged the economy, Malaria emphasi zes that Warren kick about himself decl ares that Wall-Mart has contributed more than any other job to the health of the economy (688) to further aid his argument that Wall-Mart has provided more bobs and cheaper way of living.Citing experts is an trenchant way to convince someone because doing so provides the indorser with insight that someone with discover agrees with the argument made. This creates logos which is a logic. Analogies are alike valuable when arguing. This strategy helps the reader better understand a intemperate topic by comparing It to, a more simple situation. Malaria references Wall- Mart as company that has been pulverize unionized food product stores. Malaria also uses extended illustrations, providing usages, and anticipating arguments as a strategy.He demonstrates truth behind his claims by acknowledging that unions assay to boycott the company as a Merchant of Shame. The boycott go no results, but the conglutination has more efficaciously wage d legislative battles around the country. In anti-Wall-Mart coalition has successfully lobbied more than a cardinal cycles and towns to pass ordinances to keep Wall-Mart out, opus lashings of other such bills are in the legislative hopper (Malaria 688). Although his essay includes a wide variety of strategies, it is not an example of a perfect essay.He includes problematic sentences in his text also known as a fallacy. Fallacies are often place to point-out flaws and weaknesses in ones argument. The fallacy that was most obvious in his text would be considered to be card-stacking. Malaria displays card stacking by expressing how Los Angles Economic instruction Council estimated that Wall-Mart would save Southern California shoppers $3. 76 billion annually and create up to 36,000 new Jobs. Just because this one psychoanalyse supports his claim, it does not mean this is true in every other state. Dan Levine commits many fallacies end-to-end his text.He begins his first arcogra ph by asserting that Wall-Mart is displace its sights on unfamiliar urban district a grassy lot in Hartford, Connecticut (685). This fallacy is called scare tactical maneuvers. This tactic is based around the ethical magical spell which deals with morals (right from wrong. ) The second fallacy he commits is bandwagon. Levine bandwagons activist by affirming that they have print a living-wage ordinance in one hundred ten cities and country since the mid-sass. This fallacy focuses on the super C saying majority rules. On the chase page he references Jon Green who is a director of the Working Families Party in Connecticut.Green asks should Wall-Mart provide living- wage Jobs and affordable health benefits, or not? (686) Green then says thats a different kind of question than, should thither be nothing, or should there be a massive retail phylogeny? Politically, we think thats a better sting for us (686). Levine is using Jon Green in his text to commit the testimonial fallacy. Authors use testimonials to sale themselves by citing experts in their text to Justify one to believing their claim. Olivines essay is not completely compelled with fallacies though. He also incorporates useful rhetorical strategies.The first strategy that was brought to attention was dividing and explaining. He explains how activist created a living-wage ordinance in 110 cities and countries. typically those laws require companies seeking city contracts, keeping tax abatements or other humans subsidies to pay their employees a living wage, which ignore come to several dollars above hourly minimum-wage rates (685). This strategy is extremely useful to incorporate in an essay. Broad topics prat be misleading and hard to comprehend. making steps or simplifying their evaluation helps the reader follow what he or she is nerve-racking to say.Another strategy he uses is stats and facts. Levine declares that Wall-Marts static are remarkable and compares their annual sales to blunt d omestic product of Austria. Austria is a adult rich European country, so to be compared to that specific country means a lot. Both Levine and Malaria displayed strengths and weaknesses throughout their essays. Malaria exhibited many rhetorical strategies along with a couple of fallacies while Steven Levine displayed the exact opposite. Aside from the rhetorical strengths that were utilise Malaria held a better argument.