Local Government Consolidation

Running head : LOCAL GOVERNMENT CONSOLIDATION[AUTHOR][AUTHOR AFFILIATION]Thesis : Local presidential term integration fuel work on more or less(prenominal) bowls of introductory government activity function like the get up department , flagellate collection and disposal , storm pee management , amusement and regional transportation facilities and servicesI . RationaleSince the introduction of the fantasy of topical anesthetic government consolidation in the 1970s , some local governments from the states of Wisconsin and atomic number 74 Virginia dumb install pee-peed delegacys and film groups to check into the lessons of early implementation of the functions and services of some local government . Both partial and beat consolidation and mergers incur been considered and recommendations for the benefits and p itfalls of both approaches have also been depict . These studies were mainly found from several years of experiences from other states and locales that have had some successes in its implementation of the concept . The focus was on the processes of its implementation and the amicable system of bureaucracy that implemented the consolidation that make it adopt or a failII . Summary of lessons from each area1 .1 VirginiaWith Virginia , the review committee just submitted its findings last February 2005 [3] . The summary of its findings were as follows1 .1 .1 . Of the characteristics of favored consolidations and reorganizations , it was found that in that respect is streamlined democratic control1 .1 .2 . A body grammatical constructiond or matching local government structure flock be transformed into a General Purpose modal value , one that is flexible enough to function and serve whenever and wherever needed1 .1 .3 . The corporate structure also is enabled to have its own adaptation Independent Financial R! esources . It generally means that the unified structure has the ability or is empowered to be able to dislodge its own operational fundsOf the Positive or successful characteristics of consolidation , here are the summary of findings1 .2 .1 on that point is bring down duplication of governmental services and functions .

Thus , it saves tax bullion and workforce resources that can be used elsewhere1 .2 .2 . There is change magnitude recognise strength . Unified government structures have merge acceptation and fundraising capacity as well1 .2 .3 . There is an ability to delineate national or state fundi ng Precisely because of the unified structure and large population base the coverage area warrants bigger federal and state funding allocation1 .2 .4 . Improved words of services1 .2 .5 . There is also an improved image for a unified and coalesced government . Specifically because of the new and streamlined structure there is more facility to encourage and assists businesses and new industries to relocate and create a bigger market for its products , thus supporting(a) influx of investorsMeanwhile the negative results of consolidation have been found to be as follows1 .3 .1 There is immediate loss of identity and self-sufficiency for the littler government entities1 .3 .2 . There are fewer local jobs and pick out officials1 .3 .3 . There is a resultant high tax and fees for suburban and rural residents1 .3 .4 . There is higher initial...If you wishing to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If yo u want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper