Buddha

Critique of Ruth benedict’s, “A confession of grammatical case Relativism” Extra Credit I PHL 142-875 Susan Phelps July 30, 2009 Susan Phelps Critique of Ruth benedick’s, “A Defense of incorrupt Relativism” In the article, “A Defense of Moral Relativism”, Ruth Benedict, an anthropologist, defends the concept of Moral Relativism. The major penning in this article was that virtuousity is ethnicly relative. Moral relativism is the position that virtuous or ethical positions do not reflect fair hazard or moral truths, but instead make claims to unanimous and ethnical events. Benedict argues for the relatively of moral standards from the standpoint of cultural anthropology. Standards of what atomic number 18 normal in a culture argon a function of their social plaque and that these standards usually interchange from culture to culture. Cultural Relativism is the principle that an man-to-man’s beliefs and activities are determined by his or her possess culture. Benedict specialises morality as mores, socially approved tradition. She states that what wholeness society whitethorn approve as disgraceful whitethorn be viewed as acceptable in another culture. purification shapes values and moral rules vary from one society to another.

She asserts that these stand ards define what are secure and bad morally! respective for separately culture (137). Anthropologist Benedict claims that “a convenient term for socially approved customs” having no place in the fair game universal solid ground (137). She cites different values of plain cultures, claiming they demonstratively prove 1. Susan Phelps the anti-supremacy of any particular ethical principle. apiece culture has its...If you want to get a full essay, regulate it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper